From the archives

Indiana Supreme Court Announces Ban on Blackjack Card Counters

This report is part of the Online Blackjack Odds archive. Read it as a snapshot of the blackjack world at the time it was published.

2 min read · · Online Blackjack Odds
Blackjack editorial illustration — Indiana Supreme Court Announces Ban on Blackjack Card Counters
From the archivesNames, operating status, offers, table rules and availability may have changed. Check current conditions directly.

The story, in context

  • Offers, event schedules, software and operator availability mentioned in this report may have changed.
  • Use the publication date when interpreting the story. It is not a current offer listing.

The Indiana Supreme Court recently announced a decision to allow state casinos to ban blackjack card counters and any players found to be following such card counting strategies at their tables.

The court also ruled against Thomas Donovan, a blackjack card counter who had filed charges against the Grand Victoria Casino for banning him from playing in 2006. The court denied him recovery of blackjack money worth $125,000.

When the case was taken to the high court, lawyers representing the Grand Victoria casino claimed that the casino had the right to ban anyone it wanted from its premises. Countering this argument, Donovan’s attorney claimed that the state had no specific laws prohibiting card counting. Unfortunately for Thomas Donovan’s party, the court ruled in favor of the Grand Victoria Casino and went a step further as to issue permits to Indiana casinos to ban card counters.

The Supreme Court made a 3-1 ruling and could not find anything to disallow casinos from excluding patrons of their choice. Justice Frank Sullivan Junior who presided over the case stated, “It seems to us just as likely — if not more so — that discouraging card counting enhances a casino’s financial success and directly furthers the legislature’s express objective of promoting tourism and assisting economic development.”

A question to take away

What has changed since this story was published?

Report incorrect information

Help us keep this page accurate

Tell us about a changed bonus, an incorrect rule or a broken link. Reports go to the site editor and are not published. Do not include passwords, account numbers or other personal details.

No name or email is requested. We save the page, issue and message privately for editorial review. A temporary, salted network-address key limits abuse for one hour; normal hosting logs are separate. Please submit only information you want the editor to receive.

Open this section to load the submission form.